Professor Jari is one of the pioneers of Mako Robotic arm assisted surgery having very successfully performed the first MAKO Total Knee Replacement and the second MAKO partial knee replacement in the North-West of England. The two patients concerned have kindly provided their video testimonials below.
The MAKO knee replacement surgery is available to most privately insured patients and all self-pay, patients. For our self-pay patients, Professor Jari has created an Exclusive Fixed Price All-Inclusive Package for his patients undergoing this surgery. Click on the link to see what is included
Mako Total Knee Replacement
Over the years, knee replacement techniques and instrumentation have undergone countless improvements. Mako Robotic-Arm Assisted Surgery System is an example of how technology is transforming the way joint replacement surgeries are being performed.
When you hear ‘robotic-arm assisted technology,’ it’s important to understand that the Mako Robotic-Arm doesn’t actually perform the surgery. Surgery is performed by Professor Jari, who uses the Mako System software to pre-plan the surgery. Professor Jari then guides the Mako robotic-arm to remove diseased bone and cartilage during the operation. Finally, Professor Jari will insert the knee replacement.
Mako Technology was designed to help surgeons in their efforts of providing personalized surgical experience, with each surgical plan being based on a patient’s specific diagnosis and anatomy.
The advantages of less invasive surgery are:
To allow quicker rehabilitation of the knee due to the decreased soft tissue and bony trauma.
There is also less bleeding which can lead to less swelling and less pain, which contributes to the quicker rehabilitation.
A greater range of motion can be achieved compared to a conventional approach. There is a potentially quicker return to function.
Taking all the above into account, a potential quicker return to function can be achieved, resulting in a shorter length of stay in the hospital of between 1 to 3 days.
By reducing the length of stay in a hospital, this has a secondary effect including to reduce the risk of hospital-acquired infections including MRSA as well as potentially reducing the risks of DVT and pulmonary embolus due to early mobilisation.
My patients who undergo knee replacement surgery follow an accelerated rehabilitation programme which commences on the day of surgery. This includes use of a CPM (Continuous Passive Motion) machine, immediate range of motion exercises, quadriceps strengthening, hyper-extension stretching and early walking (preferably on the day of surgery). This is combined with a specific and effective pain-relieving drug regime devised by Professor Jari which he has been successfully using with his patient for many years.
It all begins with a CT scan of the patient’s knee joint that is used to generate a 3D virtual model of patient’s unique anatomy. This virtual model is loaded into the Mako system software and is used to create the patient’s personalized preoperative plan.
In the operating theatre, the Professor Jari uses Mako system to assist in performing the surgery based on the patient’s personalized preoperative plan. The Mako system also allows the Professor Jari to make adjustments to the patient’s plan during surgery as needed. When the Professor Jari prepares the bone for the implant, the Mako system guides him within the pre-defined safe areas and helps prevent the him from moving outside the safe planned boundaries. Overall this helps safely provide more accurate placement and alignment of the implant as per the patient’s personalised plan and intra-operative adjustments undertaken by Professor Jari.
After surgery, Professor Jari, nurses and physiotherapists set goals with the patient to get the patient back on the move. They closely monitor the patient’s condition and progress. Professor Jari will also obtain and review post-operative x-rays of the new knee.
How long has the Mako procedure been available?
Does the Mako Robotic-Arm actually perform the surgery?
How long do knee implants last?
The staff have gone beyond their duty to make me feel totally at ease with everything from choosing which Hospital to making appointments and choosing my physio. Especially Claire the practice manager who went above and beyond in helping me with regards my Insurance questions and any worries/concerns that I may have had.
It has now been 8 weeks since my operation and I wish I would have had it done sooner because there is no longer anymore pain in my left knee, I feel like a completely different person now and look forward to getting back to my regular hobbies that I couldn’t do because of the pain I was in. Here’s to happy golfing/swimming/cycling.
I would certainly recommend Professor Jari (TheKneeDoc) for whatever treatment that you may require.
Many thanks for everything
With robotic arm assisted TKA vs conventional TKA there is potential for;
Reduced soft tissue trauma1
Reduced blood loss1
Lower post op pain1
Potential for reduced time to discharge and a lesser requirement for post op physio2.
1,KayaniB., Konan S., PietrziekJ., Haddad F. S. Iatrogenic Bone and Soft Tissue Trauma in Robotic-Arm
Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared With Conventional Jig-Based Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study and Validation of a New Classification System The Journal of Arthroplasty2018.03.042
2. KayaniB., Konan S., PietrziekJ., Haddad F. S. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reducedtime to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:930–7
Mako Partial Knee Replacement
Mako Robotic Arm assisted surgery has the potential for more accurate component placement1, less pain2 and better patient outcomes2 when compared to manual surgery
1.Improved accuracy of component positioning with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: data from a prospective, randomized controlled study. Bell SW; Anthony I; Jones B; MacLean A; Rowe P; Blyth M. J Bone and Joint Surg. 2016;98: 627-35.
2.Robotic-Arm Assisted Versus Conventional Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. The 2 year Clinical outcomes of a Randomised Controlled Trial Alisdair Gilmour, Angus MacLean, Philip Rowe, Matthew Banger, Iona Donnelly, Bryn Jones, Mark Blyth
Journal of Arthroplasty 2018 (ePub, ahead of print https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.050)